not idle

ChromeOS first impressions

by Mariano Cecowski

As with anything new coming from Google, there has been a lot of expectation regarding the new Google “operating system” for PCs based on the Chrome browser.

Truth is that, as the mobile-devices-oriented Android, ChromeOS can be hardly called an Operating system but rather a Linux distribution.

ChromeOS’s concept is simple; remove absolutely everything from GNU/Linux that is not essential for browsing the internet. That lets ChromeOS boot quickly, in about 10 seconds, a bit more time than of Moblin or the tuned-up version of Fedora by Intel. Google Chrome has still a lot of glitches, but I’m sure they will fix’em all in time for production.
ChromeOS login
As soon as we boot ChromeOS we are prompted not for a user on the computer but for our Google account and password. On log-on you are presented with your gmail and calendar in the Chrome browser/interface.
ChromeOS_firstpage
There are no programs available in the machine, and you are expected to use Google Docs for office tasks, gtalk for chat, gmail for your mail, or actually any web based application (e.i. meebo or Photoshop Express or Zimba). And that’s pretty much it; you cannot install any additional desktop programs, services, and you are not even supposed to get to the shell)
ChromeOS_xlab
Another advantage is the low memory usage, since there are almost no services running in the background (except for network, sound, and printing sometime in the future), and the only application running is the browser.
ChromeOS_useragent
Apart from not being able to install any desktop application, the main problem with ChromeOS is that, at least so far, it’s so cloud-oriented, that your computer will be absolutely useless if you are not connected to the internet.

Now, my desktop computer is connected to the internet all day, no big deal; but why would I cap-down my inexpensive powerful desktop computer with ChromeOS if I can have the Chrome browser together with any desktop application I want?

Of course, ChromeOS is probably oriented to MIDs, UMPCs, nettops, laptops, and other energy efficient devices to have on the go, right? But those are not connected to the internet 24/7, at least not yet.

On the other hand, there are other non-bloated Linux projects to choose from, from DSL and Puppy to Moblin and Ubuntu Mobile, that provide the full desktop experience.

It’s success will be very much connected with the hype Google produces, but we are still to see if it will let Google jump the threads-hold from something that sounds cool to something that actually is, for instance, by allowing the installation of at least ChromeOS applications. For one, when I thought they were reinventing the wheel with Chrome, they did manage to create something different and useful, so we will see if they’ll succeed again or not.

The review ends here, you can stop reading now.

It’s clear that Google, in spite of its “Don’t be evil” motto has decided to spread its tentacles as wide as possible, competing with other open-source like FireFox, Moblin or NASA’s World Wind, and closed-source initiatives like GPS routing or Photo-albums. Intelligently, whenever competing with a strong open-source option Google decided to open the source to their own projects, at least partially (Andriod, Chrome, ChromeOS), but not with other projects. Let’s not forget that you can use Google Earth, Google Maps, Sketch-up and several other pieces of software at home for personal use, but they are still closed-sourced and not free for commercial use, unlike their open-source counterparts.

Thus, by making users dependant on their software, Google can affect open-source initiatives (World Wind, OpenStreetMaps, Blender, etc.). We’ve already seen how Google sent a cease-and-desist letter to avoid a custom Andriod installation from including gmail and other Google applications. With GoogleOS, they have already said that it will not be available for machines with traditional hard disk drives; a completely artificial restriction.

5 Responses to “ChromeOS first impressions”

  1. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Freddy Snijder, open source. open source said: XLAB Tech » Blog Archive » ChromeOS first impressions: Intelligently, whenever competing with a strong open-source optio http://url4.eu/nTla [...]

    Tweets that mention XLAB Tech » Blog Archive » ChromeOS first impressions -- Topsy.com

  2. I am really looking forward to using Google Chrome OS, but does anyone find it odd that Microsoft was beat up for building there browser into the OS as a monopolistic practice, yet now Google is doing the same thing, but even more so, building the browser in so deep that the browser is the OS… Isn't this a monopolistic practice too or should Microsoft be allowed to build IE into Windows again?

    Rob

  3. [...] OS, an early review. Posted by modernityblog Filed in Uncategorized Tags: Lazy blogging, Technology Leave a [...]

    Sync That. « ModernityBlog

  4. Here is a very interesting benchmark comparing verious netnook linux distribution, including ChroniumOS (ChromeOS's open-source counterpart)

    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=chromium_moblin_benchmarks&num=1

    Mariano Cecowski

  5. Mariano Cecowski

Leave a Reply