<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ChromeOS first impressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.xlab.si/2009/11/chromeos-first-impressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.xlab.si/2009/11/chromeos-first-impressions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 00:32:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mariano Cecowski</title>
		<link>http://tech.xlab.si/2009/11/chromeos-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Mariano Cecowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.xlab.si/?p=923#comment-161</guid>
		<description>A very good article &quot;Was Chrome OS a Disappointment?&quot;

http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/was_chrome_os_a_disappointment.php?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+readwriteweb+(ReadWriteWeb)&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very good article &quot;Was Chrome OS a Disappointment?&quot;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/was_chrome_os_a_disappointment.php?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+readwriteweb+(ReadWriteWeb)&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" rel="nofollow">http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/was_chrome_os_a_disappointment.php?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+readwriteweb+(ReadWriteWeb)&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mariano Cecowski</title>
		<link>http://tech.xlab.si/2009/11/chromeos-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Mariano Cecowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.xlab.si/?p=923#comment-160</guid>
		<description>Here is a very interesting benchmark comparing verious netnook linux distribution, including ChroniumOS (ChromeOS&#039;s open-source counterpart)

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&amp;item=chromium_moblin_benchmarks&amp;num=1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a very interesting benchmark comparing verious netnook linux distribution, including ChroniumOS (ChromeOS&#39;s open-source counterpart)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&amp;item=chromium_moblin_benchmarks&amp;num=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&amp;item=chromium_moblin_benchmarks&amp;num=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sync That. &#171; ModernityBlog</title>
		<link>http://tech.xlab.si/2009/11/chromeos-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Sync That. &#171; ModernityBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.xlab.si/?p=923#comment-159</guid>
		<description>[...] OS, an early review.      Posted by modernityblog Filed in Uncategorized Tags: Lazy blogging, Technology   Leave a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OS, an early review.      Posted by modernityblog Filed in Uncategorized Tags: Lazy blogging, Technology   Leave a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://tech.xlab.si/2009/11/chromeos-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.xlab.si/?p=923#comment-158</guid>
		<description>I am really looking forward to using Google Chrome OS, but does anyone find it odd that Microsoft was beat up for building there browser into the OS as a monopolistic practice, yet now Google is doing the same thing, but even more so, building the browser in so deep that the browser is the OS...  Isn&#039;t this a monopolistic practice too or should Microsoft be allowed to build IE into Windows again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am really looking forward to using Google Chrome OS, but does anyone find it odd that Microsoft was beat up for building there browser into the OS as a monopolistic practice, yet now Google is doing the same thing, but even more so, building the browser in so deep that the browser is the OS&#8230;  Isn&#39;t this a monopolistic practice too or should Microsoft be allowed to build IE into Windows again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention XLAB Tech » Blog Archive » ChromeOS first impressions -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://tech.xlab.si/2009/11/chromeos-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention XLAB Tech » Blog Archive » ChromeOS first impressions -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.xlab.si/?p=923#comment-157</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Freddy Snijder, open source. open source said: XLAB Tech » Blog Archive » ChromeOS first impressions: Intelligently, whenever competing with a strong open-source optio http://url4.eu/nTla [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Freddy Snijder, open source. open source said: XLAB Tech » Blog Archive » ChromeOS first impressions: Intelligently, whenever competing with a strong open-source optio <a href="http://url4.eu/nTla" rel="nofollow">http://url4.eu/nTla</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
